by: Ng Cheng Wei
The article “Social and Economic Impact of Large Refugee Populations on Host Developing Countries” is published by Executive Committee of High Commissioner’s Programme Standing Committee under United Nation High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR),dated January 6th ,1997. UNHCR, also known as the UN Refugee Agency, is a United Nations agency mandated to protect and support refugees at the request of a government or the UN itself and assists in their voluntary repatriation, local integration or resettlement to a third country. The article mainly addresses all reader have to well aware the impact of large scale of refugee populations.
The article “Social and Economic Impact of Large Refugee Populations on Host Developing Countries” is published by Executive Committee of High Commissioner’s Programme Standing Committee under United Nation High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR),dated January 6th ,1997. UNHCR, also known as the UN Refugee Agency, is a United Nations agency mandated to protect and support refugees at the request of a government or the UN itself and assists in their voluntary repatriation, local integration or resettlement to a third country. The article mainly addresses all reader have to well aware the impact of large scale of refugee populations.
The
purpose of this article is to inform the readers about the impacts of refugees
influx. The presence of refugees compounds the already prevailing economic,
environmental, social and, at times, political difficulties in these countries.
Moreover, the presence of refugees, and demands on the already severely
strained economy, services and infrastructure add to the extreme hardship
affecting the local populations. In many instances, refugees become an added
impediment to, or risk jeopardizing, the development efforts of the host
country. Moving on the language aspect of this article, throughout this whole
article the writer uses simple and easily understandable language. There is not
much usage of bombastic words. But the writer has good vocabulary as well as
good command of English. In his/her writing the author is very straightforward.
For example paragraph 2 from line 13 to 15,the author says “In many instances,
refugees become an added impediment to, or risk jeopardizing, the development
efforts of the host country.” and paragraph 3,line 3 to 5 ,the author says that
“Over time, their presence leads to more substantial demands on natural resources,
education and health facilities, energy, transportation, social services and
employment”. I like the ways of author’s writing, because the author doesn’t
beat around the bush but presents his/her point as it is without any sugar
coating on it. Apart from that, the author is very informal in his writing.It
can be seen when author wrote this article with subjective tone where he/she
added on the words that describe feelings, judgements, or opinion such as
“means that”, “may causes”, “they can”, “may be”. Moreover, from the line 16 to
18 in paragraph 2 , “While the international emergency aid in response to such
an emergency does have some positive effects on the host society, this hardly
compensates for the negative consequences of such large concentrations of
refugees.” The tone is tolerant. The words “does have some positive effects”
show that the writer accepts the situation while recognizing that it could be
better. At line 15 in paragraph 2 too, author say that “Their negative aspects
may be felt long after a refugee problem is solved”. The tone is optimistic.
The writer is expecting the problems to be improved soon.
The
author has an impudent choice of words. There are some using words that are
impolite in the article.For example the author refers to the larger number of
refugees as refugees compounds. The author is biased in his/her writing
,because he/she gives more preferences, example and discusses more precisely
the bad impacts. There seem like did not have any good impacts about the large
scale of refugees in his/her writing. But his/her article got a lot of
supporting details, data and concrete evidence as there are hard facts and
figures and the most importing ,it is not only purely based on the author’s
emotions or experience. This can be prove at paragraph 1, for example in line 7
“For example, in Nepal, in the district of Jhapa, 90,000 refugees represent
over 13 per cent of the local population”, and in line 9 “ there were some
700,000 refugees among a local population of 186,000.”.\
In
a nutshell, this article is very good to read due to the solid case with proven
facts, figures , data and the language used by author in his/her writing. The
author also succeeded in inform the readers about the impacts of movement of
large scale of refugees populations to the host’s country. We do agree that the
bad impacts of that movement is more than its good impacts.
The critique written by Ng Cheng Wei based on the article "Social and Economic Impact of Large Refugee Populations on Host Developing Countries" was really a nice critique. From my point of view, I noticed that Cheng Wei shows his opinion towards the article instead of giving critique about it .Beside that, Cheng Wei did highlight the examples given in the article well. However, Cheng Wei's critique seems not-so-well organize and it troubles the readers to visualize the main point that he wanted to present. Cheng Wei did use idioms in his critique, but personally, I think that it is unnecessary as a critique need to present the main topic in a more precise and formal way. The use of idioms do not help much in that context. But overall its worth of reading it.
ReplyDeleteBased on the critique written by Ng Cheng Wei, it is not well-presented as the paragraph not divided clearly and will confuse the readers when reading the main points of article. However, he managed to deliver his ideas clearly to inform the readers about the impacts of massive movement of refugees to host countries. He presented his opinion as he agreed that the bad impacts is more than its good impact . He has pointed out the tone, style of writing, bias, and language used by the author that can provide a better understanding to readers towards this article. In conclusion, this critique can be considered as a good critique.
ReplyDelete